Sacred Cows


…Voters in general really love an ad hominem approach to the political debate. We believe what people say if they’re on our side. We smear groups with the actions of some. The tea party protesters are smeared because some participants cross a line, as they did in Jacksonville, but ACORN is smeared because some people that they hire cut corners and engage in fraud.

My suggestion here is that a debate that so constantly turns to an ad hominem approach can hardly be expected to produce rational results. That’s the trouble with our alternatives. I would gladly vote the Democrats out of office, but then the Republicans would take over. I would gladly vote the Republicans out of office, but then the Democrats would (and have) taken over.

The great equivalence, in my view, is that neither party is willing to have their sacred cow programs examined for effectiveness. They just have a different list of programs they hold sacred.

Henry Neufeld, The Trouble with our Alternatives

Arrogant Self-Assuredness


Resurrection faith…does not mean believing without evidence in the resurrection as something that has happened and will happen, but rather means trusting in the God who is capable of rescuing even from death. This should be the heart of resurrection faith: trust and hope in God rather than arrogant self-assuredness.

James McGrath in The Burial of Jesus

Not Listening


Now I want to be clear that I believe God can and does speak. If I could summarize the thesis of my book in the size of a tweet, it would be, “God always speaks; we rarely listen.”

Henry Neufeld about his book When People Speak for God

Overrun by Moles

Could the Garden of Eden have lasted very long without predators? Interesting article about death before the fall.

Narrative History?


First, on what basis do people determine that Genesis 1 & 2 must be narrative history? I am regularly asked to prove that it is something else, as though by default it must be considered narrative history. But the way one usually identifies a literary genre, especially in the ancient world where things didn’t come labeled “mythology,” “history,” or “fiction,” is to build an acquaintance with related literature. Ever since I became acquainted with a much broader range of ancient near eastern literature, it has always seemed to me that this process should be reversed. Why should something that looks so very much like other ancient near eastern creation myths be regarded as narrative history?

Henry Neufeld talking about Genesis in light of theistic evolution

An Endless Resurrection of Days


But there was never a dull torment,
and it was grace to live
among the fruits of summer, to love by design,
and walk the startling Earth
for what seemed
an endless resurrection of days.

Diane Ackerman

The Patch of Meaning


God is not the patch of meaning on the wound…God is the wound we put our patch of meaning upon.

Peter Rollins

Okay, after the fact I realize that this quote invites misinterpretation. Let me explain.

What’s the wound? Our disillusionment with the world, its suffering, and our place in it.

And then what is God? Is He a band-aid we invent to make our boo-boo feel better? Is He some patch we apply to keep our disillusionment and discontent from getting worse?

No! God is the ultimate reality, and whatever problems we have with the world we also have with Him. Whatever our understanding of God and the world, it had better be able to explain why we ended up wounded, and be more than just a covering to disguise that something’s gone wrong.

Reflect Seriously


According to the Bible, God gave great and undoubtable signs — parting seas, fire from heaven, and so on. Yet Sagan asks the pertinent question: “why should God be so clear in the Bible and so obscure in the world?” (p.167). Unless Christians and other religious believers are to abandon reason altogether or compartimentalize the Bible out from the world we live in today, then such questions must be reflected on seriously and not dismissed.

James McGrath reflects upon Carl Sagan at Exploring our Matrix

Hard Work Beats Talent


Hard work beats talent when talent doesn’t work hard.

A work of correct doctrine


But the goal of this fruitfulness is not just personal piety or assurance for the after life; it‘s to build a new kind of community in this world…I wonder if we’re so busy making the gospel a work of correct doctrine, we’re missing the point of its transforming relationships?

From an article by Kathy Hanson about a ministry to the marginalized where the fruit of the Spirit abound but where Jesus is never mentioned by name.