Funny and Useless Fan Site

Apparently this fan site for Star Trek’s Jean Luc Picard was quite popular a while ago and I missed it. Made me laugh out loud though. http://picard.ytmnd.com/

Make sure your sound isn’t turned too high if you’re at work…the sound file they play on page load is a little loud but essential and otherwise safe for work.

Enough sites like this one have been created — featuring other actors and famous movie lines — that the Wall Street Journal wrote a piece about them.

Wikipedia has an entry about them too.

Textpattern vs. WordPress

Matthew 6:24 says:

No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both…

For over a year now I’ve been bouncing back and forth between WordPress and Textpattern as my preferred publishing platform for weblogs.

Actually, it really can’t be described as going “back and forth.” I’ve been using WordPress while dreaming of Textpattern.

See, WordPress is full of features, and everything about it is easy to use. Publishing a blog entry is easy and the online editor makes simple HTML formatting easy too; changing the theme of your site is as easy as adding a new folder to the themes directory and then clicking a button in the admin interface; adding a plugin follows the same procedure in the plugin directory. There’s even a plugin that integrates the Textile markup language into the WordPress editing interface. Textile is one of Textpattern’s biggest selling points! So why am I torn between WordPress and Textile if WordPress makes all of these things so easy?

The answer is execution speed. Or maybe — the more fundamental reason behind the difference in execution speed — design.

Robots.txt: a Bad Idea?

Here’s an interesting article about robots.txt files and perhaps an even more interesting discussion in the ensuing comments.

No Fishing – or – Why ‘robots.txt’ and ‘favicon.ico’ are bad ideas and shouldn’t be emulated. | 2003-10-14 | BitWorking

The article takes issue what the robots.txt file does and where it is placed. It raised some interesting points that I enjoyed thinking about in that part of my brain that spins off and thinks about things while the rest of my brain tries to stay focused. The author says that, since the Robot Exclusion Protocol requires robots.txt to reside in a hard-coded location with respect to your domain name, it basically requires all legitimate robots to fish for information from your site: before they request a single page from any site they must first request a robots.txt file that may or may not exist. They didn’t follow a link to the file, the way you get to all other files on the WWW. They simply reach out there to see if a particular file exists on your domain without any real reason to suspect that it does. That’s fishing. And it uses bandwidth even for those sites that have no robots.txt, because they have to return a 404 error page.

Now that in itself doesn’t strike me as a compelling reason to insist that the protocol specify a link-based system for robots to discover your robots.txt file if it exists, but it begs the question of how many files may eventually be placed in a hardcoded location and therefor require fishing to find them. Once we have 100 such files will we be tired of such bandwidth draining requests for files specified by protocols that we don’t support on our site and begin wishing for a link-y method for a robot to discover whether we have that file on our site?

Statue in a Cemetary

Photo by jimfrazier

I like this statue. It sets forth a good example: the wise and strong taking interest in the small and weak.

Sand and Water

Photo by jtcoleman

I titled this photo “Sand and Water” because it shows Callie both wet and dirty. Beth Nielsen Chapman used the same title for a song about a strong person worn down by a long illness. The payoff line is, “Solid stone is just sand and water…sand and water and a million years gone by.” Sad song, but it’s a good sad.

That makes me think of the sand clinging to Callie’s face. It was once a solid stone; maybe a mountain.

Sins of Omission

I pulled out some old CDs the other day to listen to some stuff that I haven’t heard in a while. I’ve always enjoyed a wide range of musical styles, but lately I’ve been cycling through the same ten or so CDs and had started to feel like I was in a rut.

One of the CDs I retrieved was The Beginning by Michael Card. Michael’s stuff was on the contemporary Christian charts back when I bought this CD in 1989, but I haven’t really kept track of him (or much contemporary Christian music) since then. My own Christian faith died on the examining table in college — or so I had thought — but staged a remarkable comeback later; a resurrection, if you will.

The Beginning is a very hefty CD. It contains many well written, theologically powerful songs. The first five songs each deal with a major theme found in the first five books of the Bible. The next five songs are each fashioned around the life of a Hebrew patriarch. The song about Abraham, God Will Provide a Lamb, really got to me.

The Bible is not written like a modern history book or novel. The book of Genesis often seems to me to neglect the back story that would give its protagonists enough depth to make their actions seem more human and less mythological. Because of that feeling of mythology I never thought too much about Abraham as a guy just trying to make some sense of the rather amazing story he finds himself in. After waiting for years to have a child, he was told by God to sacrifice that child, and he did. Or at least he tried to: God intervened at the last second, after Abraham had proven his faithfulness.

My two dimensional view of Abraham had always made me see him as very different from me: he was a person who would kill because — why? — voices in his head told him to?

I’ve spent a lot of time worrying over the fact that when he believed God wanted him to kill his son, he decided to kill his son rather than question his beliefs.

Stay-Home Dad Magazine

Photo by jtcoleman

Stay-Home Dad magazine!

Image created by Flagrant Disregard’s Magazine Cover Creator

Blue eyed puppies


We got a puppy today. I don’t know why: we already have a dog and a cat, and we’ve recently gotten rid of three birds and a cat. But regardless, we got a puppy today.

We had a little trouble deciding what to name the puppy. Cora wanted to name him “Wags the Dog” after one of the characters on the Wiggles show on the Disney channel. On that show, Wags — as you might have guessed — is a dog.

However, Tina clenched the name for the dog in a stunning combination of scripture and pop culture. One of my favorite movies — Kevin Smith’s “Dogma” — has a character named Rufus, the 13th apostle. Interestingly enough, our pastor preached last Sunday’s sermon from Romans chapter 16, in which the 13th verse says, “Greet Rufus, whom the Lord picked out to be his very own…”. That was enough to do it. “Henceforth, let him be known as Rufus, the 13th Dogpostle.”

Pap reads to the girls

This is my grandfather reading to my children. He always lived far enough away from where I grew up that I never got to see him too often, and the same has been true for the girls. It’s been heavy on my mind the past few years that I don’t know him very well at all.

I was delighted that he and the girls got to spend some time together. The girls had a great time listening to their great-grandfather read. He was very patient and funny.

I was delighted that he and the girls enjoyed spending some time together.

An unusual load of laundry


I’m not sure if Plato envisioned some idealized form for what a load of laundry should look like, but most of the laundry I oversee fall into one of five categories: adult whites, adult colors, kid whites, kid colors, and linens.

I’m not super strict about enforcing these categories — I don’t go all Rain Man if I find a black sock among the white tee shirts — but these categories have been in use long enough that I was struck by how unusual a particular load of laundry looked when I was pulling it from the dryer. There were adult and kids clothes present. Colors and whites. And a hat!

Then I remembered. This load of laundry was the result of a full-family sandbox-and-sprinkler fest in the back yard. This photo shows the aftermath. Everyone came inside covered in sand and soaking wet. Everybody’s clothes went straight into the washer.